Submit to Readical — Book Reviews & Reflections that Apply the Page

Readical logo with open book — book reviews and reflections that apply the page

Readical is where we apply the page. We take big ideas from books and test them against the real world—policy, platforms, and everyday life. Send a traditional book review or a book reflection that draws one clear insight from a book and applies it to a current event or cultural moment. See how we do it here:

Book Review

Book Reflection

Let’s demonstrate the value of knowledge, education, and its practical application — one idea, one book, one reflection at a time.

Submission Guidelines

What We Publish

  • Book Reviews — critical, sourced analyses of a book’s argument and relevance today.
  • Book Reflections — personal or analytical essays that apply one concept from a book to modern culture, politics, or social issues.
  • Culture & Society Pieces — explorations of media, identity, and collective behavior that bridge research with real-world implications.

Writing Standards

What you write will be read by others and you’ll be assumed as an authority. Respect this! We don’t do opinions, we do arguments. There is a significant difference.

  • Length: 900–1,600 words (flexible for strong structure).
  • Voice: clear, evidence-based, and reflective — a mix of analysis and sincerity.
  • Sources: Use AP or APA consistently. If you make a claim, you must cite credible references; link primary or reputable secondary sources.
  • Accessibility: define jargon or provide an example – aim for Grade 8–10 readability.
  • Original: All work will be run through an AI and plagiarism scanner.

Formatting and Structure

  • Include a TL;DR (2–3 sentences) at the top. (optional)
  • Add Key Takeaways (3–6 bullets) before your closing section. (optional)
  • Use H2/H3 (headings) for clear flow.
  • Add hyperlinks to cited sources or relevant readings.
  • Submit in .docx or Google Doc format (comment access preferred).

Rights & Publishing

  • You retain copyright to your work. By submitting, you grant ToSpeakOnline/Readical a non-exclusive, worldwide, perpetual license to edit for clarity, publish on our website and channels, and promote the work using credited excerpts or images. If you republish elsewhere, please link back to the Readical original.
  • Selected submissions may be considered for paid collaboration or featured syndication.

What Happens After You Submit

  1. Confirmation: You’ll receive a confirmation email once your piece arrives in our inbox. If you don’t see it within a few days check your spam folder.
  2. Initial Review (1–3 business days): Our editorial team reads every submission for clarity, originality, and alignment with Readical’s mission: demonstrating the practical application of knowledge.
  3. Editorial Feedback: If your piece shows potential, we’ll reply with personalized feedback and light editorial notes. You’ll have the option to revise before publication — collaboration is part of our process.
  4. Once approved, your work will be formatted for web and shared across ToSpeakOnline and Readical channels. Published authors receive a byline, brief bio, and links to their site or socials.
  5. Promotion & Reflection: After publishing, we often feature selected essays in our newsletter or social feeds. Some may be invited to expand their topic into future collaborations or video segments for the ToSpeakOnline YouTube channel.

If the button doesn’t open your email automatically, send your piece to submissions@tospeakonline.com with subject: [Readical Submission] {Your Title}.

Last Updated: 08/09/2025

Key Takeaways

  • Readical applies the page: We turn ideas from books into real-world reflection and dialogue.
  • You can submit: Book reviews, book reflections, or culture essays that connect knowledge to modern life.
  • We value clarity and sourcing: Write with evidence, link credible sources, and define complex terms.
  • Length: 900–1,600 words — flexible if the structure is strong.
  • Voice: Analytical yet human — we favor insight over opinion.
  • Process: Every submission gets a reply within 1–3 business days and collaborative feedback.
  • You retain copyright: We publish under a non-exclusive license with credit and linking.
  • Potential collaboration: Exceptional pieces may lead to paid or featured opportunities.

FAQ

What is the process after I submit my piece to Readical?

You will receive a confirmation email, followed by an initial review within 1-3 business days. If selected, you will get feedback and an opportunity to revise. Upon approval, your work will be published and promoted across relevant channels.

What rights do I retain after submitting my work to Readical?

You retain copyright to your work, but by submitting, you grant Readical a non-exclusive license to edit, publish, and promote your work online; credit and linking are provided to original authors.

How should I structure my submission for Readical?

Include a brief TL;DR at the top if desired, organize content with clear H2/H3 headings, add hyperlinks to sources, and ensure the document is in .docx or Google Doc format with comments access for review.

What are the writing standards required for submissions to Readical?

Submissions should be 900–1,600 words, written in a clear, evidence-based, reflective voice, with credible sources cited, and should define jargon for readability; all work will be checked for originality.

What type of content does Readical publish?

Readical publishes book reviews, book reflections, and culture & society pieces that analyze and apply ideas from books or explore media, identity, and collective behavior.

Recent Member Content

View all
Kiss imprint on frosted shower glass, hand touching the pane—visual metaphor for longing in Charles Randolph’s love poem ‘A Place Reserved for Her.’

A Space Reserved for Her

Poem A Space Reserved for Her An impression left with the lipsNot on glass, but another placeA quiet place only…

A close-up of two long, rectangular stone slabs forming a minimalist bridge in a lush Japanese garden. Moss grows in the seam between the stones, framed by pink blossoms and dappled sunlight. A visual allusion to Charles Randolph’s poem “Concrete Coffins.

Concrete Coffins

Concrete Coffins A space, designed in advance, for A place, we’re meant to embrace, for… This post is only available…

Featured article image titled "The Contrasting Colors of Society" from Charles Randolph's poetry. Set on an off-white textured background, the phrase appears in bold black serif type, centered across the canvas. The image evokes themes of contrast, isolation, and social introspection explored in the accompanying poem.

The Contrasting Colors of Society

The Contrasting Colors of Society Them who survive rather than live They who mask to sense acceptance Those who dream…

Image conceptualizes Charles Randolph's poem The Great American Trauma Olympics. A golden egg, cracked open and glowing from within, rests in a luminous gold environment beside the words “The Broken Egg Awards.” The imagery evokes fragility, performance, and spectacle—symbolizing the cultural elevation of trauma as competitive currency and the poem’s critique of performative suffering in modern discourse. An excellent example of Charles Randolph's poetry that critiques modern culture.

The Great American Trauma Olympics

The Great American Trauma Olympics This is your trigger warning So be prepared to take…

This post is only available to members. log in to become a member!

Popular Posts

Follow